|
Hello
Jan 6, 2009 13:29:00 GMT -5
Post by eiron on Jan 6, 2009 13:29:00 GMT -5
Lol, thanks for all the advice you guys. I play well on stages with few obstacles, but I do better on stages with platforms to abuse. Or water Hazards. Ike and Ganon love those water stages. And on the topic of Meta Knight.....>_> Yeah, he's pretty cool. ;D
|
|
|
Hello
Jan 6, 2009 14:00:31 GMT -5
Post by starprincess on Jan 6, 2009 14:00:31 GMT -5
Lol, thanks for all the advice you guys. I play well on stages with few obstacles, but I do better on stages with platforms to abuse. Or water Hazards. Ike and Ganon love those water stages. And on the topic of Meta Knight.....>_> Yeah, he's pretty cool. ;D Now this is my type of guy. wooooo!!!!!!
|
|
|
Hello
Jan 6, 2009 14:03:21 GMT -5
Post by Angel on Jan 6, 2009 14:03:21 GMT -5
IMO, letting the stage when for you is kinda icky. You'll feel better if you put all your strength to the table and walk away with a win. Some players can play better on certain boards depending on their playing style. BB is very good at stages where there are few or no obstacles. I do better on boards with many obstacles. Basically you can put all your strength on the table but if you put it in the wrong place you'll basically weakening yourself and you're style of play. Hmm.. well, I don't know. It feels like letting the stage destroy your opponent is kinda cheap in the end. Good for a fun time, but not really for a heated contest. But fun times are good. And you do make alot of sense in your argument too.
|
|
|
Hello
Jan 6, 2009 14:51:26 GMT -5
Post by eiron on Jan 6, 2009 14:51:26 GMT -5
I get what you're saying Angel. Some stages are really unfair for certain characters, so I try to avoid situations like that. But if a stage gives one my characters and advantage, but doesn't hamper my opponent, I think that's reasonable.
Heh, glad I'm making good impressions StarMistress. ;D
|
|